| Written
by DAVID KEYES
February
28, 2003
If there's
one thing worse than being unfair, it's being predictable; that,
at least, is the popular theory as far as award shows are concerned.
And when the results for this year's Oscar nominees were revealed
early on Tuesday, February 11, the only logical thing anyone could
do was leap to their feet, throw their heads back in disbelief,
and wonder with a certain vexation in their voice, "I waited
all this time just for THAT?"
Like the dead
climax of a movie so bad that it makes viewers ask for their money
back, Tuesday's series of announcements offered little to no surprise
whatsoever for those who actually anticipated them. Those rare selections
that actually did come unexpected, needless to say, were not usually
pleasant ones, either. In fact, in comparison to the wide array
of talent recognized during the nominating phase of the previous
year, it's depressing to see how such a large group of professional
men and women can make themselves look so darn amateurish.
Of all the
easily foreseen outcomes, none were nearly as saddening as the prospect
of "Chicago," this year's most overrated and bland Oscar
contender, walking off with 13 nominations, the most for a single
film since "Shakespeare in Love." The ghastly film adaptation
of the Bob Fosse stage show, in addition to getting recognition
in the Best Picture category, also picked up multiple nods for actingRenee
Zellweger for Actress, John C. Reilly for Supporting Actor, and
Queen Latifah and Catherine Zeta-Jones for Supporting Actress. While
it can be argued that the first three of the four thespians were
not very deserving of award consideration, at least Richard Gere's
cringe-worthy work in the movie was ignored entirely in the Leading
Actor category.
Best Picture
honors ranged from the mediocre to the marvelousin addition
to "Chicago," the Academy voters also selected the equally
over-hyped "The Hours" as a contender, while "Gangs
of New York" and "The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers,"
two of last year's best films, joined them. Of the five finalists,
only "The Pianist" came off as somewhat of a surprise
victory. The obscure masterpiece, directed by Roman Polanski, also
saw its lead star, Adrien Brody, nab a nomination for Best Actor
among a crowd of expected veteran inclusions such as Daniel Day-Lewis
and Jack Nicholson.
In the Leading
Actress category, not one of the five ladies nominated was even
remotely unexpected; Salma Hayek, Nicole Kidman, Diane Lane, Julianne
Moore and Renee Zellweger each claimed victory in the field without
so much as a hint of interference. Kidman's and Moore's work is
deserved, at least, but not much can be said for the other three
ladies, who are generally likable actresses who just happen to be
undermined on this occasion by generally dry roles.
Also as anticipated,
only four of the five nominated motion pictures actually went on
to get a nod in the Directing category. The missing one? Who else
but Peter Jackson for "The Two Towers?" It's bad enough
the movie only gained six nominations totalbeing shut out
in such categories like Makeup, Costume Design and Cinematography
reportedly because certain Academy divisions felt it was basically
all the same work that they honored last year for "The Fellowship
of the Ring"but how in the world could any voter in this
field possibly ignore the zealous efforts of a man who so effortlessly
brings to life the words of J.R.R. Tolkien? It may not be nearly
as good as its predecessor, but "The Two Towers" didn't
get its magic by directing itself, either.
Notable exclusions?
Quite a few, to be honest. For one, Best Original Song was once
again dominated by traditional schmaltzy tunes like U2's "The
Hands that Built America," whereas the year's best movie tracks
were completely ignored ("Gollum's Song" from "The
Two Towers" and "Die Another Day" from the last Bond
flick, for instance). Meanwhile, Robin Williams failed to earn a
much-deserved nod for his work in "One Hour Photo," and
the most talked-about foreign films of 2002, ranging from "City
of God" to "Monsoon Wedding" and "Y Tu Mama
Tambien," were no-shows in the Foreign Language Film category,
too. And what's with the voters forgetting to nominate the brilliant
technical achievement "Minority Report" beyond Sound Effects
Editing, anyway? Apparently some members of the Academy are not
just dumb, but blind as well.
The 75th Annual
Academy Awards, better known as Hollywood's biggest political popularity
contest, will air on ABC Sunday, March 23.
©
2003, David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |