| Written
by DAVID KEYES
February
21, 2005
While browsing
through a few Oscar columns over at MovieCityNews.com, I couldn't
help but feel a slight painful twinge come over me every time I
heard the word "Sideways" uttered in a positive manner.
Nearly every professional film reviewer/analyst marks it somewhere
amongst the year's biggest potential achievements at next week's
awards. Comments like these come in hordes:
Virginia
Madsen should win for "Sideways"
Thomas Hayden Church should win for "Sideways"
Paul Giamatti should have been nominated for "Sideways"
"Sideways" should win Best Picture, Director and Adapted
Screenplay
Anyone who likes a good movie should see "Sideways"
"Sideways" cures cancer
It's tiring,
it's obnoxious. And frankly it is absolutely baffling as to why
this rather bland vehicle, about four people who spend their time
tasting wines and practicing the fine art of engaging in boring
dialogue exchanges, is getting such heaps in so many circles.
What movie
were these people seeing, anyway? Certainly not the same one I had
the displeasure of sitting through last month, I'll tell you that
much. With the possible exception of the penis jokes, in fact, "Sideways"
is basically a long and overstretched in-joke crying for a new punchline.
The acting is sub-par, the writing is stagnant, and the characterizations
are so banal that I couldn't care less as to what happened to any
one of them.
An acquaintance
in the Rotten Tomatoes journal community made an interesting point
concerning Alexander Payne's endeavor: that critics probably liked
it because it's easy for them to relate to shallow and petty people
on celluloid. Whether that's a valid point is anyone's guess (including
mine), but the sentiment is on target. What was the appeal? Would
they have liked the film less if it involved characters who were
more... shall we say... legitimate? Good questions.
In any case,
here's hoping that Oscar forgets entirely about Payne's overrated
comedy next week and actually gives its awards to films that truly
deserve the recognition.
©
2005, David Keyes, Cinemaphile.org.
Please e-mail the author here
if the above article contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |